Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/986/2000 of DAHYABHAI @ BAKHIYO PRAHLADBHAI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 13 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 986 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 986 of 2000
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- DAHYABHAI @ BAKHIYO PRAHLADBHAIVersus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MS SUBHADRA G PATEL for Petitioner
MS HANSA PUNANI, APP for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 13/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. Rule. Ms.Hansa Punani waives service of Rule on behalf or respondents.
#. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ground given for rejection of the application of the petitioner for furlough leave no more survives as after this order, in the criminal case, reference of which has been made in the order aforesaid, the petitioner has been acquitted.
#. If that fact is correct, then certainly the matter deserves to be reconsidered. In the result, this special criminal application and Rule is disposed of in the terms that the matter be reconsidered in the light of subsequent developments which have taken place after passing of that order and final order in the matter be passed within period of seven days from the date of receipt of writ of this order. No order as to costs.
.......
(sunil)