Gujarat High Court

SCA/8540/1999 of RITESHKUMAR SURESHBHAI PATEL Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 23 December 1999

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8540 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA and MR.JUSTICE PRADIP KUMAR SARKAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8540 of 1999

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA and

MR.JUSTICE PRADIP KUMAR SARKAR

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RITESHKUMAR SURESHBHAI PATELVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR PUSHPADATT VYAS for MR BS PATEL for Petitioner MR PREMAL JOSHI, ld.AGP for Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA and MR.JUSTICE PRADIP KUMAR SARKAR

Date of decision: 23/12/1999

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Rule. Mr.Premal Joshi waives the service of Rule on behalf of the respondents.

Page 1 of 2

2. It has been submitted by both the sides that a short point is involved in this matter and the same may be decided at this stage. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that in this case, the objections under Section 5(A) of the Land Acquisition Act were not invited after the issuance of the Notification under Section 4 for the purpose of acquiring the land in question situated at village Bithali, Taluka Sinor, District Vadodara. The factual position that the objections under Section 5(A) were not invited is not disputed by learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader, under instructions from Mr.B.R.Sukhadia, the concerned Deputy Mamlatdar who is present in the Court along with the papers. In this view of the matter, the said Notification dated 16th August 1999 at Annexure.A to the petition, under Section 6 of the Act cannot be sustained in the eye of law. The same is hereby quashed and set aside. It will be open for the respondents to take up the proceedings subsequent to the stage of the issuance of Notification under Section 4 and proceed with the further proceedings in accordance with law. The Special Civil Application is allowed in terms as above and the Rule is also made absolute as above. No order as to costs.

******

Sreeram.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead