Gujarat High Court
SCA/3568/1986 of BAI TAKHATBA BALUBHA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 28 November 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3568 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3568 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? ( No. 1 to 5 NO ) -------------------------------------------------------------- BAI TAKHATBA BALUBHAVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PV HATHI for Petitioner Mr. S.T. Mehta, Ld. Govt. Counsel for Respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE
Date of decision: 28/11/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Ld. Counsel Mr. P.V. Hathi for the Petitioner makes a statement that, the petitioner Smt. Takhatba is no more and that, nobody comes forward to prosecute the petition. It therefore appears that the present petition requires to be disposed of as having been abated. I order accordingly.
Any how, upon a plea coming from ld. counsel Mr.
Hathi, I say that, in case of the heirs coming forward with a desire to continue the present petition, it shall be their liberty to make the appropriate application for the revival of the present petition.
Petition stands disposed of with these orders.
Rule shall stand discharged. No order as to costs.
-----
/vgn.