Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2886/2021 of SAFINA BI AND ANOTHER Vs UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME AND OTHERS on 31 December 2021

106 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2886/2021 CM No. 9652/2021 Safina Bi & anr. …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Anuj Malhotra, Advocate V/s Union Territory of J&K & ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Sanchit Verma, Assisting

Sr. No. 106

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU

Safina Bi & anr.

WP(C) No. 2886/2021

CM No. 9652/2021

…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)

Through:- Mr. Anuj Malhotra, Advocate

V/s

Union Territory of J&K & ors.

…..Respondent(s)

Through:- Mr. Sanchit Verma, Assisting counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG

CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER

1. Petitioners seek a direction to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 4 to 7. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and have married out of their own free will. Copies of Nikah Nama dated 09.11.2021 and proof of petitioners’ date of birth have been placed on record. They submit that since they have contracted the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to 7, as such, they are facing harassment at their hands.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and anr.; 2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.

3. Both the petitioners are present in Court and are identified by their counsel.

4. Perusal of the record annexed with the writ file reveals that petitioners are major and have contracted marriage on 09.11.2021 according to Muslim Personal Law, Rites and Customs.

Page 1 of 2

5. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect their life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them.

6. Keeping in view the relief sought for, this petition is disposed of, at this stage itself, by providing that respondent Nos. 2 & 3 shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in married life of the petitioners, if the petitioners approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage, and the police is free to take a view on the basis of the available material and inquiry. If it is found that the parties are major and have married out of their own free will and consent, the necessary protection shall be extended to them.

7. Disposed of alongwithconnected CMs.

(Sindhu Sharma) Judge

JAMMU 31.12.2021 RAM MURTI Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead