Uttarakhand High Court
SA/1364/2001 of RAM LAL Vs KUNWAR SINGH and ANOTHER on 15 December 2001
Appeal No. 1364 of 2001. Ram Lal …………. Appellant/ Plaintiff. Versus Kunwar singh & Anr. A No. 1364 of 2001 ………Respondents/ Defendants. Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. A suit for perpetual injection was filed by the plaintiff/appellant seeking
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Court No.2
Second Appeal No. 1364 of 2001.
Ram Lal
…………. Appellant/ Plaintiff.
Versus
Kunwar singh & Anr. A No. 1364 of 2001 ………Respondents/
Defendants.
Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J.
A suit for perpetual injection was filed by the plaintiff/appellant seeking permanent injunction to restrain the defendants not to interfere in the use of path which was being used from the time of his ancestors as common path.
On the pleading of parties, a specific issue Was framed and the trial court, while dealing with the aforesaid issue, recorded a finding that it was a path Heard given by the defendants over their own plot. It was a private path but the plaintiff was allowed to use the same. The trial court did not find it tobe a old and ancestral path. The said finding has also been affirmed by the appellate court.
From the perusal of the impugned order, I find that no substantial question arises to be decided in this second appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
(P.C.Verma, J.)
15.12.2001P.Singh