Uttarakhand High Court
C482/1460/2013 of Anjali Bhatia Vs State Of Uttarakhand AND ANOTHER on 30 December 2013
of 2013 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, A.G.A. with Ms. Sangeeta Miyan, Brief Holder for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Preliminary objection has been raised by Mr. M.A. Khan, A.G.A. for the State regarding
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
C482 No.1460 of 2013Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. M.A. Khan, A.G.A. with Ms. Sangeeta Miyan, Brief Holder for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Preliminary objection has been raised by Mr. M.A. Khan, A.G.A. for the State regarding maintainability of this criminal misc. application. He submitted that the applicant has alternative remedy of filing revision before the Sessions Judge, and prayed that the present criminal misc. application may be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Since the applicant has alternative remedy of filing revision before the Sessions Judge, the present criminal misc. application is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. The applicant is permitted to file revision before the Sessions Judge.
Let a certified copy of this order be supple to the learned counsel for the parties, today itself, on payment of usual charges.
Arpan
(V.K. Bist, J.)
30.12.2013