Uttarakhand High Court

HABC/30/2025 of MOHD ALIM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 26 September 2025

Cites 1, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Habeas Corpus Petition No.30 of 2025 Mohd. Alim …… Appellant Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……Respondents Presence: Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned DAG along with

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITALHabeas Corpus Petition No.30 of 2025

Mohd. Alim

…… Appellant

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

……Respondents

Presence:

Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned DAG along with Mr. Rakesh Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State.

Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Petitioner has filed instant Habeas Corpus Petition, inter alia, on the ground that he and Ms. Marium were in relationship; they married on 16.09.2025. The family members of Ms. Marium are powerful and source full persons, they were against this marriage. They are trying to harm the petitioner as well as Ms. Marium. They have captured Ms. Marium.

2. Today, Ms. Marium is produced before the Court by Sub Inspector Surbhi Rana, Police Station Ramnagar. Ms. Marium told the Court that she is staying with her parents in her parents’ house with her own free will. She is not under any compulsion or pressure. In fact, she categorically denied having solemnized any marriage. According to her, in the early hours’ of 16.09.2025, she left her home on the assurance of the petitioner that he would help her prepare for her MBBS studies. Thereafter, the petitioner took her in a village in Muzaffarnagar and sexually harassed her. He also forced her to sign on a Nikahnama. Ms. Marium states that she does not want to go 2025:UHC:8715-DB

with the petitioner. According to Ms. Marium, her date of birth is 01.11.2003.

3. Ms. Marium is a major, she is free to stay wherever she wants to live. According to her, she is freely staying with her parents, therefore, there is no reason to make any interference. The instant petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 26.09.2025

BSBALWANT SINGHDigitally signed by BALWANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=fbbd191c8bdb8b16e8ca7937deaf72a17c02fe2eacbf28cdf4ba7ce8640c5820, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=04E141DF4614F9A4D5F48346EB553DE5185F418755DC00A7A13C14A680C3FA90, cn=BALWANT SINGH Date: 2025.10.06 16:55:09 +05'30'

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 26.09.2025

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead