Uttarakhand High Court
C482/1463/2013 of Ram Kishan Verma AND ANOTHER Vs State Of Uttarakhand AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2013
of 2013 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Bhuwanesh Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. K.S. Rangarh, Brief Holder for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of K.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
C482 No.1463 of 2013Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
Mr. Bhuwanesh Joshi, Advocate for
the petitioners.
Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. K.S.
Rangarh, Brief Holder for the State.
Heard learned counsel for the
parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of K. Neelaveni vs. State represented by Inspector of Police and others reported in (2010) 11 SCC 607,seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the factual and legal points before the learned Magistrate, seeking discharge at the appropriate stage.
Learned counsel, however, submits that petitioners shall appear/surrender before the learned Magistrate in compliance of the cognizance/summoning order on or before 15.01.2014, and shall move application seeking regular bail. Learned counsel further submits that in view of the judgments of this Court in the cases of Hari Gupta and another Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, WPCRL No. 758 of 2013, decided on 26.06.2013 and Ist Bail Application No. 982 of 2013, Smt. Reena Vs. State of Uttarakhanddecided on 12.08.2013, petitioners should not be arrested and sent to judicial custody and the learned Magistrate, may be directed to decide the bail application on the same day.
Permitted to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
However, petitioners shall appear/ surrender before the concerned Magistrate, on or before 15.01.2014 pursuant to the cognizance/summoning order in question as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
In the event of moving bail application by the petitioners, same shall be decided, if possible, on the same day. If for any reason, application is posted for future hearing, petitioners shall be enlarged on interim bail till final decision is taken on the regular bail application.
However, it is made clear, if petitioners fail to appear/surrender till 15.01.2014 before the learned Magistrate, the learned Magistrate shall be at liberty to proceed against the petitioners in accordance with law.
Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the learned concerned Magistrate, immediately.
Let a certified copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, within 48 hours, on payment of usual charges.
Arpan
(V.K. Bist, J.) 31.12.2013