Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/23572/1999 of ROOP CHAND LAKHERA Vs THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION on 26 December 2007
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 226 of 2007 (S/B) Old No. 23572/1999 Roop Chandra Lakhera S/o Sri Goverdhan Pd. Lakhera, R/o Sitanpur Devi Road, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal ….. Petitioner Versus The Public Service Commission, U.P. Allahabad through its Secretary
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 226 of 2007 (S/B)
Old No. 23572/1999
Roop Chandra Lakhera S/o Sri Goverdhan Pd. Lakhera, R/o Sitanpur Devi Road, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal ….. Petitioner
Versus
The Public Service Commission, U.P. Allahabad through its Secretary …… Respondent
………………
Sri Atul Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of Sri B. D. Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Lalit Belwal, Advocate for the respondent.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.
RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral)
Sri Atul Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of Sri B.D. Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Lait Belwal, Advocate for the respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the parties submit that the writ petition filed by petitioner Roop Chandra Lakhera in the year 1999, seeking a direction to the respondent to disclose the marks secured by the petitioner in the examination conducted by the Public Service Commission in the year 1997, has now become infructuous on account of the lapse of a period of about 10 years since the filing of the writ petition.
3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous.
A
(J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 26.12.2007
(Rajeev Gupta, C.J.)
26.12.2007