Uttarakhand High Court
CLR/89/2002 of SMT. SUSHMA Vs SMT. RAJBALA and ORS. on 24 December 2003
of 2002 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Parikshit Saini learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and perused the record. Question related to the legal heir of late Basudev Verma S/o Tejpal Singh. The name of the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CLR No. 89 of 2002
Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J.
Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Parikshit Saini learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and perused the record.
Question related to the legal heir of late Basudev Verma S/o Tejpal Singh. The name of the revisionist Smt. Sushma Devi as the heir find place in paper 14-A (Annexure -1 of the revision) and considering this it is evident that the learned trial court did not consider that the revisionist was a necessary party to the proceedings and her name could not have been deleted from array of the party.
Considering this the revision is allowed and impugned dated 24-9-2002 is set aside.
order
(Irshad Hussain, J.)
Dated: 24-12-03 ISB