Gujarat High Court
SCA/7108/1999 of DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER Vs PRABHATBHAI BECHARBHAI DESAI on 20 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7108 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7108 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/-
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order mJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
Nos. 1 to 5 No
-------------------------------------------------------------- DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
Versus
PRABHATBHAI BECHARBHAI DESAI
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR KM PARIKH for Petitioner
MR RM PARMAR for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 20/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Mr.R.M.Parmar waives service of rule. By consent the petition is taken up for immediate hearing.
The respondent was employed as driver in the petitioner corporation. He was found guilty of remaining absent without leave from 17.1.1992 to 5.3.1992 and was dismissed from service in departmental proceedings. The Labour Court has allowed the reference and has set aside the punishment of dismissal on the ground that it is excessive and has ordered the respondent to be reinstated in service without backwages and has awarded the punishment of stoppage of one increment. After hearing the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and in view of the previous record the punishment of stoppage of two increments with permanent effect is ordered to be awarded. The award made by the Labour Court shall stand modified accordingly. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No order as to costs.
���---
m.m.bhatt