Gujarat High Court
SCA/1922/1997 of CHAMPAKLAL JAGANNATH DHYANI DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 17 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1922 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1922 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- CHAMPAKLAL JAGANNATH DHYANI DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRSVersus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PK PANCHOLI for Petitioners MR MUKESH PATEL ASSTT. G.P. for Respondent No. 1 MR AJ PATEL for Respondent No. 2, 3, 4, 5
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH
Date of decision: 17/11/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Service of Rule is waived by Mr. Mukesh Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent No. 1 State and Mr. A.J. Patel, learned advocate appearing for respondents Nos. 2 to 5. On the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is taken up for final hearing today.
2. This petition is directed against the impugned orders dated 1st July, 1992 passed by the learned Deputy Collector in Tenancy Appeal No. 732 of 1991, dated 24th November, 1995 passed by the learned Tribunal in Revision Application No. 709 of 1992 and 4th December, 1996 passed by the learned Tribunal in Review Application No. TEN.CA.5/96. The short question that was canvassed all throughout was that one Chhotabhai Nathabhai in respect of whom entry No. 4520 dated 20th July, 1966 in respect of land bearing survey No. 2027/1 of village Bakrol admeasuring 0 Acre 27 Gunthas came to be made was not alive and that fact being not in dispute, would go at the root of the matter. Under such circumstances, private parties would have no objection if the matter is remanded to the learned Mamlatdar for holding the inquiry afresh in respect of whether the alleged tenant Chhotabhai Nathabhai, since deceased, was deemed purchaser. In my opinion, it would be just and proper to direct such inquiry being held a fresh. In the facts of the case as revealed in the petition and from the submissions made on behalf of the rival parties, following directions are issued :
The impugned orders are hereby set aside and the matter is revived for inquiry as aforesaid being held by the learned Mamlatdar and A.L.T., Anand. The inquiry as aforesaid shall be held and the decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, in accordance with law, without being influenced by this order. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms only with no order as to cost.
17.11.1998. ���(M.S.Parikh,J.)
Vyas