Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/953/2013 of Puneet Oberoi Vs State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2013 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. K.S. Rangarh, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate for the respondent no.3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submitted

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

WPCRL No.953 of 2013

Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.

Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. K.S. Rangarh, Brief Holder for the State.

Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate for the

respondent no.3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submitted that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed in the matter.

In view of the above, this criminal writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.

Arpan

(V.K. Bist, J.)

30.12.2013

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead