Gujarat High Court
CRA/369/1997 of UDABHAI MADHABHOY Vs MADHAVSINH JASWANTSINH RAOULJI on 19 November 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 369 of 1997 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7641 OF 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 369 of 1997
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7641 OF 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- UDABHAI MADHABHOY
Versus MADHAVSINH JASWANTSINH RAOULJI
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR YS LAKHANI for Petitioner
UNSERVED AS EXPIRED for Respondent No. 1
MR MTM HAKIM for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH
Date of decision: 19/11/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Service of rule waived by Mr. MTM Hakim, learned advocate appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is permitted to amend the C.R.A.
by joining the heirs of deceased respondent no.1 and accordingly Civil Application No. 7641 of 1997 will stand disposed of by making rule absolute in that application.
3. In so far as the present C.R.A. is concerned after some amount of submissions, learned advocates have expressed consensus for passing following order :-
(i) Both the parties will maintain status-quo till the suit is finally decided.
(ii) The order of status-quo will not prejudice any criminal proceedings undertaken by any of the respondents and such proceedings will be decided in accordance with law without being influenced by this order.
(iii) Regular Civil Suit No. 33 of 1995 pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.) Balasinor shall be expeditiously heard and decided preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this direction. Learned advocates appearing before this court will intimate their counter-part before the trial court to cooperate with the expeditious disposal of the suit.
Subject to aforesaid directions, rule is discharged. No order as to cost.
* * *
** pvr **