Gujarat High Court

SCR.A/1588/1997 of MAHEBOOBBHAI HUSAINBHAI KHALIFA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 24 December 1997

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1588 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1588 of 1997

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and

MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH

============================================================

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- MAHEBOOBBHAI HUSAINBHAI KHALIFAVersus STATE OF GUJARAT

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BN RAVAL for Petitioner PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and ��MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH Date of decision: 24/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per Patel, J.) Trupti is produced before us by her father. She has in clear terms stated that she is not in wrongful confinement and she is willingly staying with her parents. She further states that her signatures were obtained by the petitioner on certain forms; there is no question of conversion and no religious rites were performed. She has further stated that she is a Hindu and she is following all Hindu religious ceremonies. Even today, she has put on 'chandla' and bangles. At the request of learned advocate for the petitioner, the petitioner was called and even in the presence of the petitioner she has stated that she would like to reside with her father and she has no desire to reside with request of learned advocate for the petitioner, the petitioner was called and even in the presence of the petitioner she has stated that she would like to reside with her father and she has no desire to reside with anyone else including the petitioner.

We are satisfied that Trupti is not in wrongful confinement, and she is at liberty to go wherever she likes.

This petition, therefore, need not be entertained any further and stands disposed of accordingly. Notice is discharged.

csm./���----------

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead