Rajasthan High Court
CW/8329/2017 of SAYALA COLLEGE Vs JAI NARAYAN VYAS UNIVERSITY and ORS. on 18 December 1990
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8329 / 2017 Sayala College, Sayala, Main Bazar, Sayla District Jalore Through Its Principal, Dr. Bhanwarlal S/o Sh. Narayan Lal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident of Sayala, Post Sayala, Tehsil Sayla, District Jalore (Raj.)
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8329 / 2017
Sayala College, Sayala, Main Bazar, Sayla District Jalore Through Its Principal, Dr. Bhanwarlal S/o Sh. Narayan Lal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident of Sayala, Post Sayala, Tehsil Sayla, District Jalore (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar 2. The Controller of Examination, Jai Narain Vyas University,Jodhpur.
3. The Commissioner, College Education, Government ofRajasthan, Commissionarate, Jaipur.
4. The Coordinator, PTET - 2017, M.D.S. University, Ajmer.
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Shah
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.G. Ojha & Mr. Vinay Jain _____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/12/2017
The prayer in the present petition is to direct therespondent-University to declare the result of the students ofpetitioner College and issue mark sheet in favour of all thestudents who have pursued their BA final year examination 2016-17 from petitioner College.
Learned counsel for the respondent University has pointedout that the results have since been declared on 15/12/2017. A
copy of the same has been placed on record. It is further pointedout that the result of some of the students stand cancelled in viewof the fact that they were found involved in mass copying.
In view of the above, the writ petition is renderedinfructuous. Dismissed accordingly.
However, while issuing notices on 17/07/2017, an interimorder was passed directing the respondent-Colleges to allow thestudents of the petitioners college to deposit their fees towardsthe course and also allowed to report at the concerned college. Itis clarified that all those students, who will be found disqualifiedon account of declaration or non-declaration or cancellation oftheir result or otherwise, will be at liberty to pursue their otherremedies, if so available to them.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR), J.
sanjaysolanki,pa