Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/46813/2016 of SUKHJEET KAUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 30 December 2016
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46813-2016 Decided on :30.12.2016 Sukhjeet Kaur ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present : Mr.Digvijay, Advocate, for Mr.H.P.S.Ishar, Advocate for the petitioner. G.S.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-468 13-201Decided on :30.12.2016
Sukhjeet Kaur
— Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S. SAANDHAWALIAI
Present ;Mr.Digvijay, Advocate, for
Mr.H.P.S.Ishar, Advocate for the petitioner, G.S. Sandhawalia_J. (Oral)
In the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., thepetitioner seeks directions to provide protection to the life and libertyfrom the private respondents No. 4 to 6, who are parents and brother ofthe petitioner.
It is alleged that the petitioner has performed marriagewith Sukhwinder Singh on 28.12.2016, according to the Sikh rites andceremonies. It has been averred that initially roka ceremony wasperformed by the parents with Sukhwinder Singh and thereafter, onaccount of objections of private-respondents, the marriage was notbeing solemnized. However, the petitioner has left her house, after themarriage with Sukhwinder Singh and on account of which, there is athreat perception. Representation dated 28.12.2016 (Annexure P2) hasbeen filed with respondent No.2. It is stated that the petitioner is amajor, having born on 15.06.1993, as per the AADHAR card(Annexure P1) and therefore, she is entitled for protection.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-468 13-201
.&.
Notice of motion.
After hearing counsel for the _ petitioner, withoutcommenting upon the validity/legality of the marriage or the age of thepetitioners and keeping in view the binding precedent of the Hon'bleApex Court in Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another 2006(2) SCC
(Criminal) 478, the present petition is disposed of with direction torespondents No.2 & 3, to look into the above said representation filedby the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with lawand provide protection, if so required.
DECEMBER 30, 2016sqilesh
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA)JUDGEH
Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/NoWhether Reportable:Yes/No