Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/1139/2002 of KIRPAL SINGH PAWAR Vs STATE and ORS on 31 December 2007

of 2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri R.K. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition

Heard Sri R.K. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents.

Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the settled by Hon’ble Single Judge and confirmed by this court vide judgment and order dated 29.12.2007 in Writ Petition No. 1479 (S/S) of 2006 (Balbir Singh Bisht & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.).

present writ petition has already been

In view of the above statement, writ and observations made by this Court vide judgment and order dated 29.12.2007 in Writ Petition No. 1479 (S/S) of 2006 (Balbir Singh Bisht & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.). All the pending applications stand disposed of.

petition is disposed of on the same terms judgment and order dated 29.12.2007 in (M.M.G., J.)

31.12.2007VKS

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead