Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/1139/2002 of KIRPAL SINGH PAWAR Vs STATE and ORS on 31 December 2007
of 2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri R.K. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition
Arguments
Heard Sri R.K. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents.
Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the settled by Hon’ble Single Judge and confirmed by this court vide judgment and order dated 29.12.2007 in Writ Petition No. 1479 (S/S) of 2006 (Balbir Singh Bisht & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.).
present writ petition has already been
In view of the above statement, writ and observations made by this Court vide judgment and order dated 29.12.2007 in Writ Petition No. 1479 (S/S) of 2006 (Balbir Singh Bisht & Ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.). All the pending applications stand disposed of.
petition is disposed of on the same terms judgment and order dated 29.12.2007 in (M.M.G., J.)
31.12.2007VKS
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…