Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/60/2017 of SWAMI VIVEKANAND POLYTECHNIC Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2020
of 2017 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. P. Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
WPMS No. 60 of 2017
Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
Mr. P. Kumar, Advocate holding brief of
Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present writ petition has now become infructuous by efflux of time.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.)
Aswal
31.12.2020