Rajasthan High Court
CRLMA/422/2022 of UMESH CHANDRA PAREEK SON OF LATE HANUMAN PAREEK Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 22 December 2022
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 422/2022 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10695/2022 1. Umesh Chandra Pareek Son Of Late Hanuman Pareek, Resident Of Plot No. 15 Mohan Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass, P.s. Shipra Path , Jaipur (Raj) 2. Smt.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 422/2022
In
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10695/2022
1. Umesh Chandra Pareek Son Of Late Hanuman Pareek,Resident Of Plot No. 15 Mohan Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass,P.s. Shipra Path , Jaipur (Raj)Resident Of Plot No. 15 Mohan Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass,P.s. Shipra Path , Jaipur (Raj)
2. Smt. Rama Pareek Wife Of Umesh Chandra Pareek,Resident Of Plot No. 15 Mohan Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass,P.s. Shipra Path , Jaipur (Raj)Resident Of Plot No. 15 Mohan Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass,P.s. Shipra Path , Jaipur (Raj)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2. Smt. Rashmi Rai Wife Of Shri Ankit Pareek, Resident OfPlot No. 221, 10B Scheme, Gopalpura Byepass, P.s.Shipra Path Jaipur (Raj.)Plot No. 221, 10B Scheme, Gopalpura Byepass, P.s.Shipra Path Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop PareekFor Respondent(s): Mr. Ganesh Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
22/12/2022
The matter comes up on an application for correction in thecause title of the order dated 13.12.2022 passed by this Court.
Page 1 of 2
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time offiling of the criminal misc. petition, the name of the father of thepetitioner was typed out as “Late Shri Hanuman Pareek”. Counselsubmits that the aforesaid fact came in his notice where hereceived the certified copy of the order dated 13.12.2022 passedby this Court. Counsel further submits that father of the petitioner is still alive so the typographical error made in the cause title ofthe main petition may kindly be allowed to be corrected. Counselfurther submits that he has submitted amended cause title in thisregard.
Considering the submissions made at the bar and looking thecontentions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, thetypographical error in the cause title with regard to the name ofthe father of the petitioner is allowed to be corrected. Theamended cause title is ordered to be taken on record.
Office is directed to place the same at appropriate place andthe name of the father of the petitioner be read as “Shri HanumanSahai Pareek” instead of “Late Shri Hanuman Pareek”.
The order passed today shall be treated as part and parcel ofthe earlier order dated 13.12.2022.
The application stands allowed for the reasons statedtherein.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Ashu/380
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…