Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/8026/2019 of MAHAVEER SON OF SHRI SURAJMAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 December 2019
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8026/2019 1. Mahaveer Son Of Shri Surajmal, Aged About 43 Years, By Caste Meena, Resident Of Balunda, Police Station Mangrol, District Baran (Rajasthan) 2. Rambharat Son Of Shri Raghuveer, Aged About 17 Years, By
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8026/2019
1. Mahaveer Son Of Shri Surajmal, Aged About 43 Years, ByCaste Meena, Resident Of Balunda, Police StationMangrol, District Baran (Rajasthan)Caste Meena, Resident Of Balunda, Police StationMangrol, District Baran (Rajasthan)
2. Rambharat Son Of Shri Raghuveer, Aged About 17 Years,By Caste Meena, Resident Of Balunda, Police StationMangrol, District Baran (Rajasthan) Being Minor ThroughHis Father And Natural Guardian Raghuver Son OfSurajmal, Resident Of Balunda, Police Station Mangrol,District Baran (Rajasthan)By Caste Meena, Resident Of Balunda, Police StationMangrol, District Baran (Rajasthan) Being Minor ThroughHis Father And Natural Guardian Raghuver Son OfSurajmal, Resident Of Balunda, Police Station Mangrol,District Baran (Rajasthan)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2. Deendayal Son Of Shri Jaganath, By Caste Rathi, ResidentOf Bamori Kalan Mangrol, Police Station Mangrol, DistrictBaran (Rajasthan)Of Bamori Kalan Mangrol, Police Station Mangrol, DistrictBaran (Rajasthan)
3. Mahaveer Son Of Shri Jailal, By Caste Rathi, Resident OfBamori Kalan Mangrol, Police Station Mangrol, DistrictBaran (Rajasthan)Bamori Kalan Mangrol, Police Station Mangrol, DistrictBaran (Rajasthan)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish KhandelwalFor State:Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, AGCFor Complainant: Mr. Khizer Iqbal KhanFor State:Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, AGCFor Complainant: Mr. Khizer Iqbal Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
20/12/2019
Page 1 of 2
This criminal misc. petition has been filed seeking quashmentof the FIR No.266 dated 04.11.2019 registered with Police StationMangrol, District Baran for the offences under Sections 279 and304-A IPC on the strength of compromise between the parties.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners thatthe FIR came to be lodged under bona fide mistake and wrongimpression. They have settled their dispute amicably andtherefore, the FIR in question be quashed.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer.
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant-respondentsNo.2 and 3 supported the submissions made by learned counselfor the petitioners and prayed that the FIR in question be quashedas the parties have settled their dispute amicably and thecomplainant is not interested in prosecuting the matter further.
The accused-petitioner Mahaveer, complainant-Deendayaland Mahaveer, son of Shri Jailal, father of the deceasedarepresent in person and have submitted that in view of amicablesettlement of the dispute amongst them, the FIR be quashed.
Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused therecord. A perusal of the FIR reveals that it does not involve anyheinous offence as excepted by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the caseof Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and Anr reported in JT
-2012 (9) SC426 . Therefore, keeping in view the fact that theparties have amicably settled their dispute and the FIR in questiondoes not involve any heinous offence, I deem it just and proper toquash the FIR No.266 dated 04.11.2019 registered with PoliceStation Mangrol, District Baran This criminal misc. petition is allowed accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…