Rajasthan High Court

CW/2828/2009 of BAJRANG PAREEK Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS on 18 December 2009

WRIT PETITION NO.2792/2009 GULAB CHAND TAK VS. UOI & ORS. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2828/2009 BAJRANG PAREEK VS. UOI & ORS. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3253/2009 DUNGAR SINGH VS. UOI & ORS 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3836/2009 MULTANA RAM VS. UOI & ORS. 5. S.B. CIVIL

1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2792/2009GULAB CHAND TAK VS. UOI & ORS. GULAB CHAND TAK VS. UOI & ORS.

2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2828/2009BAJRANG PAREEK VS. UOI & ORS.BAJRANG PAREEK VS. UOI & ORS.

3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3253/2009DUNGAR SINGH VS. UOI & ORS DUNGAR SINGH VS. UOI & ORS

4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3836/2009 MULTANA RAM VS. UOI & ORS.MULTANA RAM VS. UOI & ORS.

5. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3840/2009 BHAWANI SHANKER & ORS VS. UOI & ORS.BHAWANI SHANKER & ORS VS. UOI & ORS.

6. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3841/2009 CHANDA RAM VS. UOI & ORS.CHANDA RAM VS. UOI & ORS.

Date of order : 18.12.2009

HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

None present for the petitioner(s).

Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondentState. Mr.VK Mathur, for the respondent-UOI

<><><>

Since learned Addl. Advocate General Sh. RL Jangidand learned Sr.CGSC Sh. VK Mathur put in appearance for all the respondents in connected matters and they havebeen decided finally, therefore, the service is complete andat the request of learned counsel for the respondents,these writ petitions are decided in the light of the judgment of this Court delivered in S.B.Civil Writ PetitionNo.2718/2009 – Prem Prakash Vs. UOI & Ors. decided on21.11.2009 alongwith other connected matters.

In view of the above, the present writ petitions arealso allowed and petitioners are allowed to continue on therespective posts till the scheme of Lok Talim (or scheme inany other name) is implemented. The petitioner(s) shall beentitled for continuity in service, but no entitled to fixremuneration for intervening period in case the scheme ofLok Talim (or in any other name) is implemented.

[PRAKASH TATIA], J.

cpgoyal/-

Page 1 of 2

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO._______/2009

Date of order : 18.12.2009

HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

None present for the petitioner(s).

Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondentState. Mr.VK Mathur, for the respondent-UOI

<><><>

This writ petition is allowed [ see separate judgment inS.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2792/2009-GULAB CHAND

TAK VS. UOI & ORS]. decided today itself.

By orders

Court master.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead