Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/16184/2019 of ARFEENA W/O AJRU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 December 2019

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16184/2019 1. Arfeena W/o Ajru, Aged About 26 Years, B/c Mev R/o Bandhedi Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar Raj. 2. Arfeed S/o Chav Khan, Aged About 21 Years, B/c Mev R/o Bandhedi Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar Raj. 3.

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16184/2019

1. Arfeena W/o Ajru, Aged About 26 Years, B/c Mev R/oBandhedi Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar Raj.Bandhedi Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar Raj.

2. Arfeed S/o Chav Khan, Aged About 21 Years, B/c Mev R/oBandhedi Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar Raj.Bandhedi Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar Raj.

3. Raheesh S/o Chav Khan, Aged About 24 Years, B/c Mev R/o Bandhedi Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s): Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA

Order

20/12/2019

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438Cr.P.C. for enlarging the petitioners on anticipatory bail for theoffences under Sections 494 and 494/120-B IPC.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners thata complaint has been filed in which cognizance has been taken foroffence under Sections 494 and 494/120-B IPC in whichpetitioners were summoned through arrest warrant. It is furthersubmitted that the offences are bailable.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counselfor the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, thiscourt deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners onanticipatory bail.

Page 1 of 2

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. TheS.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, in the event of arrest of thepetitioners Arfeena, Arfeed and Raheesh in Criminal caseNo.238/2016, they shall be released on bail, provided each ofthem furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- eachwith two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to thesatisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves availablefor interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectlymake any inducement, threat or promise to any personacquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuadehim from disclosing such facts to the court or any policeofficer, and

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India withoutprevious permission of the court.

(PRAKASH GUPTA),J

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead