Rajasthan High Court
CW/23862/2017 of TIKAM CHAND SHARMA Vs STATE OF RAJ AND ORS on 21 December 2017
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23862 / 2017 Tikam Chand Sharma S/o Shri Shiv Prasad Sharma, by Caste Brahmin, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Anandpura, Tehsil Kuchamancity, District Nagaur (Raj.). Presently Working As Teacher Level II At Govt. Higher Secondary
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23862 / 2017
Tikam Chand Sharma S/o Shri Shiv Prasad Sharma, by Caste Brahmin, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Anandpura, Tehsil Kuchamancity, District Nagaur (Raj.). Presently Working As Teacher Level II At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Barjan, Nawan, District Nagaur
----Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Education Secretary, Elementary Education, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer (Secondary-I), Nagaur, Rajasthan
4. The District Education Officer (Elementary), Nagaur, Rajasthan
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ganesh ChaturvediFor Respondent(s) :
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANAOrder 21/12/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since thecontroversy raised in the instant writ application is with referenceto transfer and posting and at this stage, the petitioner would besatisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider therepresentation of the petitioner within a time frame in thebackdrop of adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of thisCourt in the case of Bhagwana Ram Versus State & Ors.: S.B. CivilWrit Petition Number 6272/2016, decided on 24[th] August, 2016.
Referring to another order made in S.B. Civil Writ PetitionNumber 12450/2016 (Harishankar Verma Versus State ofRajasthan & Ors.), disposed off on 3[rd] October, 2016, learnedcounsel would submit that the State-respondents therein weredirected to consider the representation with reference to mutualtransfer or transfer on the ground of illness and in the eventualitywhere the vacancies existed without any compromise onadministrative exigency.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writproceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to addressa comprehensive representation enclosing the copies of the ordersin the cases of Bhagwana Ram and Harishankar Verma (supra),within two weeks hereinafter.
In case, a representation is so addressed within theaforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to considerand decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order asexpeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in nocase later than six weeks from the date of receipt of therepresentation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, thewrit application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/147