CW/20843/2012 of PRAHLAD SAHAI SAINI Vs STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENTANR on 21 December 2012

I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAI PUR.* * *

S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on NO. 20843/ 2012

DATE OF ORDER : 21/ 12/ 2012

HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE AJAY RASTOGI * * *

Mr . Banwar i Shar ma, f or pet i t i oner .

The pet i t i oner who i s a Teacher at onest age appr oached t hi s Cour t by f i l i ng wr i tpet i t i on f or cer t ai n l egi t i mat e benef i t s t o whi chhe was ent i t l ed f or under t he l aw. However ,si nce t her e was no or der passed by t he aut hor i t yt hi s Cour t di sposed of t he wr i t pet i t i on wi t hl i ber t y t o make r epr esent at i on and t her espondent s wer e di r ect ed t o deci de t he same i naccor dance wi t h l aw,pur suantt her et o t her epr esent at i on was submi t t ed by t he pet i t i onerand t hat has been di sposed of by t he aut hor i t yvi de or der dt . 30. 10. 2012 assi gni ng r easons.

Counselsubmi t s t hatt wo per sonssi mi l ar l y si t uat ed appr oached t hi s Cour t byf i l i ng wr i t pet i t i ons and t hat came t o be deci dedwi t h di r ect i on t o t he i ncumbentt o maker epr esent at i on, pur suant t o whi ch bot h of t hemsubmi t t ed t hei r r epr esent at i on and i n one caset he aut hor i t y accept ed t he gr i evance but asr egar ds gr i evance of t he pet i t i oner , t hat hasbeen r ej ect ed by t he aut hor i t y vi de or deri mpugned and t he act i on of t he r espondent bei ngdi scr i mi nat or y t he pet i t i oner has appr oached t o t hi s Cour t by f i l i ng i nst ant pet i t i on. The or derunder chal l enge i s i ndeed appeal abl e bef or e t heSer vi ce Appel l at e Aut hor i t y Tr i bunal under t heAct 1976 and as r egar ds t he submi ssi on made t hatcan al ways be l ooked i nt o by t he Tr i bunal . I nvi ew of t he al t er nat i ve r emedy avai l abl e t o t hepet i t i oner t hi s Cour t i s not i ncl i ned t oi nt er f er e under wr i t j ur i sdi ct i on u/ Ar t . 226 oft he Const i t ut i on.

Consequent l y, t he wr i t pet i t i on st andsdi smi ssed. However , t he pet i t i oner i s at l i ber t yt o avai l appr opr i at e r emedy whi ch t he l aw per mi t st o hi m.

[AJAY RASTOGI], J.

DSR

"All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order beingemailed"

Datar SinghP.S.