Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/21017/2021 of BHAGCHAND S/O SHIVRAJ Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 December 2021

JUDICATURE FOR WASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S m B - Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 20983/2021 Narendra Chaudhaty S/o Chhoturam Chaudhary, R/o TeJaJi Ka Chokh Bargaon Ps ~ i s h a n ~ a r h ~ i s t , Ajmer (At Present confined In Central Jail Ajmer) Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP d

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR WASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 20983/2021

SmB-

Narendra Chaudhaty S/o Chhoturam Chaudhary, R/o TeJaJi Ka Chokh Bargaon Ps ~ishan~arh ~ist, Ajmer (At Present confined In Central Jail Ajmer)

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP I.-c '3 ig .L- ,h\P+i d 'B u G~ ----~espondent C- -$> * * "4 .-) fqaZk, 7 Connected With 8- .tu, 2"' " V& S.B. Crim'l,?al Miscellaneous Bail Application I*<- No. 2497/2021 \.J -?. ~~[REDACTED] S/o Shivraj, Aged About 28 Years, *+ *+ Ka .L- C- -$> * * "4 .-) fqaZk, 7 Connected With 8- .tu, 2"' " V& S.B. Crim'l,?al Miscellaneous Bail Application I*<- No. 2497/2021 \.J -?. ~~[REDACTED] S/o Shivraj, Aged About 28 Years, *+ *+ Ka ~ohallabidwada Ps Bandar Sindri Bandar Sindri Sindri Dist. Ajmer Raj. (At resent In ~ohallabidwada Central Jail Ajmer)

Ps Bandar Sindri Bandar Sindri Sindri Dist. Ajmer Raj. (At resent In

----Petitioner

State Of Rajasthan, T For ~etitioner(s)

----Respondent

21/12/2021

1. [The instant bail applications have been filed under Section ]

439 cr . p . C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR ~~.305/2021 registered at Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer for the offence under Section 392 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a false case Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a false case 2. has been foisted against the petitioners. They have nothing to do with the alleged offence, and no useful purpose would be served by keeping them behind the bars.

3* Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the applications.

Page 1 of 2

Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the 4m parties and looking to the possibility that the trial may take long time to conclude, this court deems it just it just just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail: 3 62% ?k- 5. Accordingly , ,., 2 the bail v-'% are allowed--and it is ordered that the 1 .C6L..J enlargedon bail provided they furnish of Rs.50,000/- with two s .25,000/- each to to the satisfaction of the 1 r appearance before as and when called and when called when called called the court concerned upon to do so.

time to conclude, this court deems it just it just just and proper to enlarge with two s .25,000/- each to to the 1 r appearance before as and when called and when called when called called (FA WAND ALI) ,3

Simple Kumawat /168-169

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead