Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/16984/2019 of KRISHNA@KARUA S/O SHRI ASHOK B/C GURJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 December 2019

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16984/2019 Krishna @ Karua S/o Shri Ashok B/c Gurjar, R/o Vill. Pidawali Ps Kanchanpur Dist. Dholpur Raj. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16984/2019

Krishna @ Karua S/o Shri Ashok B/c Gurjar, R/o Vill. Pidawali PsKanchanpur Dist. Dholpur Raj. (Presently Lodged In Dist. JailDholpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya MishraFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sher Singh Mehla, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

20/12/2019

Order

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.in connection with FIR No.324/2019 registered at Police Station,Kanchanpur, District Dholpur, for the offences under Sections 379,411, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC.

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits thatallegation against the accused petitioner was to be possessing amotor-cycle wherein number-plate was changed and the chesisnumber was also not properly shown.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applicationand submitted that it is the accused petitioner, who has changedthe number-plate of the motor-cycle.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned PublicProsecutor appearing for the State and carefully scanned therelevant material made available on record.

Taking into consideration that prima facie I do not find suchan allegation coming up against the petitioner, but withoutexpressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, Ideem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Page 1 of 2

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directedthat accused petitioner – Krishna @ Karua son of Ashok shall bereleased on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection withaforesaid FIR provided he furnishes a personal bond ofRs.20,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to thesatisfaction of the concerned Magistrate with the stipulation thathe shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section437(3) Cr.P.C.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J

Karan Bhutani /531/2

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead