Rajasthan High Court
ARBAP/97/2021 of M/S SHUBHAM TRADERS Vs JAIPUR ZILA DUGDH UTPADAK SAHKARI SANGH LIMITED on 22 December 2022
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Arbitration Application No. 97/2021 M/s Shubham Traders, Proprietorship Concern, Having Its Office At First Floor, F-3, Real Enclave Apartment, Ambabari, Jaipur, Through Its Proprietor, Shri Ramavatar Jhalani S/o Shri Niranjan Lal Jhalani, Aged About
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Arbitration Application No. 97/2021
M/s Shubham Traders, Proprietorship Concern, Having Its OfficeAt First Floor, F-3, Real Enclave Apartment, Ambabari, Jaipur,Through Its Proprietor, Shri Ramavatar Jhalani S/o Shri NiranjanLal Jhalani, Aged About 64 Years, R/o F-3, Aa 1, Real Enclave,Kaushal Kishore Marg, Ambabari, Jaipur.
----PetitionerVersus
1. Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, NearGandhi Nagar Railway Station, Jaipur Through ManagingDirector.Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, Jaipur Through ManagingDirector.
2. Manager (Marketing), Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak SahkariSangh Limited, Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station,Jaipur.Sangh Limited, Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station,Jaipur.
3. Manager (Finance), Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak SahkariSangh Limited Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, Jaipur.Sangh Limited Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalit Kishore Joshi on behalf of Mr. Arvind Gupta For Respondent(s)
: Ms. Ishita Rawat on behalf of
Mr. Gunjan Pathak
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PANKAJ MITHAL
Order
22/12/2022
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Page 1 of 2
2. The sole Arbitrator appointed in the matter, vide letter dated11.11.2022 has informed that despite notices and variousopportunities, no one has turned up on behalf of the claimant tofile any claim petition and, therefore, he has closed theproceedings. 11.11.2022 has informed that despite notices and variousopportunities, no one has turned up on behalf of the claimant tofile any claim petition and, therefore, he has closed theproceedings.
3. The Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act iscompetent to close the proceedings, if the parties are notresponding and as such, he has rightly closed the proceedings asthe claimant is not turning up.
(PANKAJ MITHAL),CJ
Kamlesh Kumar/Rajat Kumar/6
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…