Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/20964/2021 of DHANRAJ MEENA S/O SHRI MADAN LAL MEENA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 December 2021

JUDICATURE FOR WASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 19819/2021 Jagdish Prasad Meena S/o Shri Ramlal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Ajeta, Police Station Gandoli, District Bundi ( Raj.) ( A t Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota) ----Petitioner

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR WASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 19819/2021

Jagdish Prasad Meena S/o Shri Ramlal Meena, Aged About 33

Years, Resident Of Ajeta, Police Station Gandoli, District Bundi ( Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota)

Versus

----Petitioner

1. [The ][present bail application has been filed under Section ][439 ]

c~p.~. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with connection with FIR ~~.438/202 1 Registered at Police Station Head Central Office, Anti been arrested in connection with connection with FIR

~~.438/202 Corruption offence(s) under Sections 7, 7A (Amended) Act, 2018 and 120-8 IPC.

Bureau, Jaipur, District Chowki ACB, Bun& for the under Sections 7, 7A of Prevention of Corruption (2 of 2)

2. Learned counsel for

the

petitioners

submits that

the

Page 1 of 2

petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners are behind the bars since 28.11.2021 and conclusion of trial may take long time. Counsel for the petitioner submits that they have wrongly being trapped this matter no work was pending with them and there is no evidence regarding demand of illegal gratification -r =.y- \ *p+",\ !/- 1. made by the petition.ei;s qi s- qi s- s- ';A>.d /% w .\ A. J. 1 ci *-', -2.4 ,C#, made by the petition.ei;s qi s- qi s- s- ';A>.d *-', -2.4 ,C#, b- cq 3. Learned R~bl~c Prosecutor has ~pposed thk.t@lapplication. .%'; " 1.-., v ,,,3 ,,.: 4. ~onSl~efing the contentions put-forth by the cbqnsel for the x&.) -.,.. <-p9 ! - petitione?and taking into account the facts and circumstances wpz$ of the case and case, this court on bail. -2.4 ,C#, b- cq 3. Learned R~bl~c Prosecutor has ~pposed thk.t@lapplication. .%'; " 1.-., v ,,,3 ,,.: 4. ~onSl~efing the contentions put-forth by the cbqnsel for the x&.) -.,.. <-p9 ! - petitione?and taking into account the facts and circumstances wpz$ of the case and case, this court on bail.

5. Accordingly, the Section 439 Cr. P. C. is allowed and it is Jagdish satisfaction of the with two sureties of ~sr24~$q?/!~e~?~&the .A Y ' -4 I.=-*{ \ L \,ad I tq learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(FARJAN D ALI),J

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead