Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/20970/2021 of HARIKESH MEENA S/O SHRI RAJMAL MEENA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 December 2021
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S-Bm Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 20970/2021 Harikesh Meena S/o Shri Rajmal Meena, Aged About 19 Years1 R/o Bhura Ka Tapra Sherganj Ps Indargarh Dist. Bundi Raja (At Present Confined I n Central Jail Bundi) Versus State Of Rajasthan,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S-Bm Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 20970/2021
Harikesh Meena S/o Shri Rajmal Meena, Aged About 19 Years1
R/o Bhura Ka Tapra Sherganj Ps Indargarh Dist. Bundi Raja (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bundi) Present Confined In Central Jail Bundi)
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Samarth Sharma.
: Mr. S.S. Mahla, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
.
.&
The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner Harikesh Meena S/o Shri Rajmal Meena. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR N0.189/2021 registered at Police Station Dei District Bundi for the offence(s) under sections . 363, 366, ,I1 '376-D, . 344 IPC and 5~ >ii.. and 6 of POCSO Act. ,.#> . -._ , . __"_ f *. . 4,
2. [Learned counsel for the 'petitiorier submits that a false case ]has been foisted against the petitioner. He has nothing to do with the alleged offence, and no useful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this matter.
3. Per contra, learned Public prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4*
Page 1 of 2
Considering
the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the possibility that the trial may take long time to conclude, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. the petitioner on bail.
15.
15. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.'C- is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner, tm''ned above, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of~~~s:50,000/- wit'hift*2 Sureties of Rs.25,000/- &. ' each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner, tm''ned above, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of~~~s:50,000/- wit'hift*2 Sureties of Rs.25,000/- &. ' each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(FAUAND ALI),J
PREETI VALECHA /I62
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…