CRLMB/15687/2015 of RAJANTI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP on 18 December 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.15687/2015.: :

Rajanti Vs. State of Rajasthan

: :Date of Order :: 18.12.2015.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL

Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman, for the petitioner.Mr. R. R. Baisla, Public Prosecutor for the State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Apprehending her arrest, the accused-petitioner has filed thispresent application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail inrespect of FIR No.127/2013 registered at Police Station Nadaoti for theoffences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 307 & 336 IPC readwithSection 3 of PDPP Act.

On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the respectiveparties and the material made available for my perusal and more particularlylooking to the fact that similarly situated co-accused have already beengranted benefit of bail by the Court, but without expressing any final opinionon the merit and de-merit of the case, I deem it just and proper to grantindulgence of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Nadoti in F.I.R.No.127/2013 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner RajantiW/o Shri Nemi Chand, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes apersonal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-

(i) .that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by apolice officer as and when required;

(ii) . that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as todissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

(iii) . that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

(PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL ),J.

A.Arora/-Item No.334.

All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in thejudgment/order being emailed.”

AMIT ARORAPERSONAL ASSISTANT