Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/16879/2016 of SMT SANDHYA SHARMA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP on 22 December 2016
COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 16879 / 2016 Smt. Sandhya Sharma D/o Shri Uma Shankar Sharma, by Caste Brahamin,, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 64/507, Sector Ward No.22, Pratap Nagar, Tehsil Sanganer District Jaipur. At Present in Central Jail,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 16879 / 2016
Smt. Sandhya Sharma D/o Shri Uma Shankar Sharma, by CasteBrahamin,, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 64/507, Sector Ward No.22,Pratap Nagar, Tehsil Sanganer District Jaipur. At Present inCentralJail,Ajmer.
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
----Petitioner
----Respondent
__________________________________________________
Counsel For Petitioner(s) : Shri Harendra Singh Sinsinwar. Counsel For Respondent(s) : Shri R.R.Baisla, PP.
__________________________________________________
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINAOrder
22/12/2016
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Codeof Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R.No.267/2010 registered at Police Station, Beawar City Distt. Ajmerfor offences under Section 420, 406 and 120-B of Indian PenalCode, 1860 and Section 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Prize Chits andMoney Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted thatthe petitioner had resigned from the post of Director of company,that is M/s Oro Trade Network (India) Limited on 05.10.2008.
[CRLMB-16731/2016]
Page 1 of 2
F.I.R. in the present case was registered on 02.06.2010 underSection 420, 406 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 andSection 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Act. Offence was allegedly committedin the year 2009. Petitioner could not be held criminallyresponsible for any act committed by the company after she hadresigned. Petitioner is a cancer patient and is undergoing medicaltreatment. In similar F.I.Rs, petitioner has been grantedanticipatory bail by this Court. Petitioner is in custody since28.08.2016. Challan has already been presented in the Court andconclusion of trial may take time.
Learned State Counsel has opposed the petition.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the caseand without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, thispetition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject tosatisfaction of the Trial Court.
(SABINA)J.
N.Gandhi/c/8
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…