Rajasthan High Court

SAW/81/2014 of SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL TRAINING Vs STATE TECHNICAL EDUCATION ORS on 19 December 2014

(Writ) No.81/2014. Saraswati Industrial Training Centre. VERSUS State of Raj. & Ors. D.B.Special Appeal (Writ) No.81/2014. Saraswati Industrial Training Centre. VERSUS State of Raj. & Ors. 19.12.2014. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE

D.B.Special Appeal (Writ) No.81/2014.Saraswati Industrial Training Centre. VERSUS State of Raj. & Ors.19.12.2014.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.K.RANKA

Mr.Mahendra Goyal, Counsel for appellant.Mr.N.M.Lodha, Advocate General/Sr.Counsel assisted byMr.Vishal Sharma, Counsel for respondent-State.Mr.Kunal Rawat, Counsel for respondent-NCVT.

*****

Learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondent-State, informed this court that in the FIR lodged by the AntiCorruption Bureau, however, the Final Report has beenproposed but the joint inspection report reveals that theappellant-Institution fails to meet out the standards laid down bythe National Council for Vocational Training. It is also informedto this court that further action has been initiated in the form ofproposal for de-affiliation of the appellant-Institution and thattoo is pending with the competent authority.

Counsel for appellant submits that it might be pendingbefore the competent authority but no final decision has beentaken and that being so, at least he is entitled to seek indulgencefor declaration of the result of students who appeared underinterim order of the court.

After taking into consideration the submissions, weconsider it appropriate to direct the respondents to declare theresult of the students who appeared under interim orders of thecourt and they may be permitted to go ahead in accordance withlaw.

D.B.Special Appeal (Writ) No.81/2014.Saraswati Industrial Training Centre. VERSUS State of Raj. & Ors.

In the facts and circumstances brought to our notice, it willbe in the fitness of things that whatever action, proposed to betaken, must be taken within a period of two months and the finalfate of the same be informed to the appellant-Institution as well.

Consequently, the instant special appeal, in the aboveterms, stand disposed of.

(J.K.RANKA),J.

(AJAY RASTOGI),J.

All corrections made in judgment/order have beenincorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.Solanki DS, Sr.P.A.

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead