Uttarakhand High Court

BA1/1123/2009 of GOVIND SINGH PARIHAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 December 2009

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Bail Application No.1123 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Govind Singh Parihar ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

Criminal Bail Application No.1123 of 2009

Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE

Govind Singh Parihar ……….Applicant (In Jail)

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

------- Opposite party

________________________________________________________

Arising out of Case Crime No.1271 of 2009, U/s 8/20 of NDPS Act, P.S. Kotwali Bageshwar, Distt. Bageshwar Dated: December 29, 2009

Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.

Heard Sri Dinesh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State.

In brief the prosecution case is that on 16.09.2009 at about 5:45 P.M. about one kilogram of Charas was said to be recovered from the possession of the applicant/accused. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the commercial quantity of Charas is one kilogram and it is stated in the recovery memo that including weight of the polythene bags, the weight of Charas is one kilogram. He further submitted that the recovered Charas may be less than one kilogram and in that event, the recovered quantity would be less than one kilogram. Lastly, he is in jail since 16.9.2009 and the trial has yet not been started.

After considering all the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage.

Let the applicant Govind Sigh Parihar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Distt. Bageshwar.

The bail application is allowed accordingly.

29.12.2009Rajeev Dang

(Dharam Veer, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead