Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/130/2009 of SANJAY @ SANJEEV CHAUDHARY AND ANR Vs STATE AND ORS on 31 December 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln. No.11386/09) Mr. Prem Kaushal, Adv. for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Perused the application supported by affidavit. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned. Delay condonation application is
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPCRL No.130/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
(Delay Condn. Appln. No.11386/09)
Mr. Prem Kaushal, Adv. for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Perused the application supported by affidavit. Delay in filing the counter affidavitis condoned. Delay condonation application is accordingly allowed.
Learned brief holder makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners-Sanjay @ Saneev Chaudhary and Satendar Kumar. Averment to this effect has also been made in paragraph no.2 of the counter affidavit filed by the I.O.
In view of the above development, the writ petition has now become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous with the observation that interim order dated 05.03.2009 passed by this Court shall continue till the charge sheet is received by the court concerned.
(D.V., J.)
31.12.2009
Rajeev Dang