Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/108/2017 of M/S M.M CONSTRUCTION Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY on 31 December 2020
of 2017 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by efflux of time, the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Arpan
(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.)
31.12.2020