Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/513/2009 of HAZI SALEEM and ANOTHER Vs STATE and OTHERS on 29 December 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, Adv. i/b Mr. Lokpal Singh, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement that after completion of investigation, final report has been submitted in this case. Averment to this effect has been
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPCRL No.513/09
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
Mr. Tapan Singh, Adv. i/b Mr. Lokpal Singh, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement that after completion of investigation, final report has been submitted in this case. Averment to this effect has been made in paragraph no.2 of the counter affidavit filed by the I.O.
In view of the above development, the writ petition has now become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous with the observation that interim order dated 12.06.2009 passed by this Court shall continue till the final report is received by the court concerned.
Rajeev Dang
(D.V., J.)
29.12.2009