Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/871/2008 of ISAM PAL AND OTHERS Vs STATE AND OTHERS on 26 December 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 871 of 2008 Isam Pal and others …... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …… Respondents Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Criminal Writ Petition No. 871 of 2008
Isam Pal and others …... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …… Respondents Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.
Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, Advocate for respondent No.3.
2. Shri B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned on 28/11/2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Interim order dated 05.11.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned.
26.12.2008Shiv
(J.C.S. Rawat, J.)