Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/16941/2008 of SHAMJIBHAI MAKABHAI MAKWANA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 30 December 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 16941 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Issues
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 16941 of 2008
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
=========================================================1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment ?1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment ?
2To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3[Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy ]of the judgment ?of the judgment ?
Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the 4constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?
5[Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ]?
=========================================================SHAMJIBHAI MAKABHAI MAKWANA & 3 - Applicant(s)Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
=========================================================Appearance :MR ASHISH M DAGLIfor Applicant(s) : 1 - 4.Mr. L.R.Poojari,A.P.P. for Respondent(s) : 1,None for Respondent(s) : 2,=========================================================
CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
Date : 30/12/2008
ORAL JUDGMENT
Even before the petition could be entertained and notice be issued, learned counsel Mr. C.S.Popat, appeared for respondent no.2, the original complainant, with a request to quash the complaint, which is sought to be quashed in the petition. Rule. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent waives service.
In view of the fact that the complaint and the criminal case arise out of a purely private dispute among the friends and they have amicably settled the dispute and requested to allow the petition and learned A.P.P. having no objection, the petition is allowed. The complaint registered as C.R.No.I-223 of 2008 before Thorala Police Station of Rajkot is quashed by consent and rule is made absolute with no order as to costs. Vakalatnama of Mr. Popat may be accepted by the office.
Sd/-
(D.H.WAGHELA,J.)
Jyoti