Bombay High Court

WP/10827/2009 of SHRI. ANAND SAKHARAM JADHAV Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING on 30 December 2009

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10827 OF 2009 Anand Sakharam Jadhav ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh for Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Bhosale – AGP for Respondents - State. CORAM : S. A . BOBDE & ANOOP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 10827 OF 2009

Anand Sakharam Jadhav

..Petitioner

versus

State of Maharashtra

..Respondent

Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Bhosale – AGP for Respondents - State.

CORAM : S. A. BOBDE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. (VACATION COURT)

DATED : DECEMBER 30TH, 2009.

P.C. :

1. Heard.

2. After hearing the matter for sometime, the following order is passed by consent:

3. The Respondent – Appellate Authority shall decide the petitioner’s application as well as appeal filed by him within a period of eight weeks from the date the petitioner appears before it. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Appellate Authority on 2[nd] January, 2010.

4. Application for stay shall be decided within a period of two weeks.

5. Writ Petition disposed of.

(S. A. BOBDE, J.)

(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead