Bombay High Court
WP/559/2003 of SMT. VILAS P.FORGENT ALIAS NAIK AND 2 ORS., Vs SHRI NILU KUSTA GAONKAR AND ANR., on 4 December 2003
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 559 OF 2003 SMT. VILAS P.FORGENT ALIAS NAIK ....Petitioners AND 2 ORS., Versus SHRI NILU KUSTA GAONKAR AND ANR., ....Respondents SHRI SUDESH USGAONKAR,MS.KAMAXI SAMBARI,R.1 & 2 Coram:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. Date:- 4th December, 2003 P.C.: Heard. By
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 559 OF 2003
SMT. VILAS P.FORGENT ALIAS NAIK AND 2 ORS.,
Versus
....Petitioners
SHRI NILU KUSTA GAONKAR AND ANR.,
....Respondents
SHRI SUDESH USGAONKAR,MS.KAMAXI SAMBARI,R.1 & 2
-Coram:A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
-Date:
4th December, 2003
P.C.:
Heard. By consent, the following orderis passed:-Parties to maintain status quo withregard to the suit property as of today,till the disposal of the suit.Instead of going into the correctness ofthe orders passed by the courts below atinterlocutory stage, it is agreed thatthe suit filed by the petitionersbearing Regular Civil Suit No.18 of 1996itself be expedited. In thecircumstances, the learned Civil Judge,Junior Division, Sanguem, shall expeditethe hearing of the suit and preferablyfinally dispose of the suit within oneyear from today. It is made clear thatany observations made by the Courtsbelow in the orders which are impugnedbefore this Court shall not influence the merits of hte case and the trial Court will be well-advised to decide thesuit on the basis of evidence that wouldbe adduced by the parties during thetrial, on its own merits, and in accordance with law.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.