Uttarakhand High Court
FA/149/2022 of MAYANK CHAUDHARY Vs ITISHA CHAUDHARY on 17 September 2025
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No. 149 of 2022 Mayank Chaudhary ...... Appellant Vs. Itisha Chaudhary ..... Respondent Present: Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for the respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Appeal No. 149 of 2022
Mayank Chaudhary
...... Appellant
Vs.
Itisha Chaudhary
..... Respondent
Present:
Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The instant appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 15.07.2022, passed in Family Suit No.271 of 2017, Mayank Chaudhary Vs. Itisha Chaudhary, was instituted in the court of Family Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar (“the suit”), by which the petition filed by the appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking divorce has been rejected.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have arrived at a settlement. They have decided to stay separate. They have submitted their affidavits today alongwith miscellaneous application no.02 of 2025. Therefore, the appeal may be decided in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
4. The appellant and the respondent both are personally presented today. They have admitted that they have decided to stay separate and they have settled the dispute amicably.
5. The respondent-Itisha Chaudhary, particularly has stated that she is agreeable to the divorce.
6. The parties have settled the dispute amicably, therefore, the appeal is decided in terms of the settlement arrived at in between the parties of which terms have been stated by the parties in their respective affidavits filed along with miscellaneous application no.02 of 2025. 7. The miscellaneous application no.02 of 2025 and the affidavits filed alongwith shall form part of this order.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
17.09.2025
Ravi Bisht