Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/3696/2017 of Smt Maya Devi Vs State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017
3696 of 2017 U.C.Dhyani, J. Mr. P. C. Maulekhi, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. M. C. Tiwari, learned Deputy Advocate General, present for the State/ respondents no. 1 & 4. Mr. Rakesh Thapaliyal, Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, present for the respondents no. 2 & 3. By
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPSS No. 3696 of 2017
U.C.Dhyani, J.
Mr. P. C. Maulekhi, Advocate, present for the petitioner.
Mr. M. C. Tiwari, learned Deputy Advocate General, present for the State/ respondents no. 1 & 4.
Mr. Rakesh Thapaliyal, Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, present for the respondents no. 2 & 3.
By means of present writ petition, the [petitioner seeks following relief, among others:
“Issue a writ, order or direction of mandamus directing the respondents to pay entire arrear of revised pension and other benefits to the petitioner since 01.01.2006 to 15.01.2015 with interest in accordance with 6[th] Pay Commission and further direct the respondents to give the benefit of 7[th] Pay Commission to the petitioner.”
After arguing the writ petition at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer only to the extent that respondent no. 2 may kindly be directed to decide petitioner’s representation, to which, learned counsel for the respondents have no objection.
Present writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order, at an earliest possible but not later than three weeks of presentation of certified copy of this Order alongwith a fresh representation.
Needless to say that decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner soon thereafter.
Let a copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner today itself on paymen[t of usu]al charges.
(U.C.Dhyani, J.)
29.12.2017