Bombay High Court
WP/316/2005 of M/S. ANMOL ENTERPRISES Vs MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF GR. BOMBAY AND ANR. on 30 December 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT
:1:
:1:
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3504 OF 2004
M/s.Anmol Enterprises .. Petitioner.
v/s.
The Municipal Corporation
of Gr. Bombay & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Uday Warunjikar with Mr. Lonke for the petitioners.
Mr. Vinod Mahakik, for the respondents.
CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J.
CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J.
(VACATION JUDGE)
(VACATION JUDGE)DATE : 30TH DECEMBER, 2004.
DATE : 30TH DECEMBER, 2004.
P.C :
P.C :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By consent of the parties the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.
2. The learned counsel for the Corporation tenders a note dated 30.12.2004 containing instructions which are given to the learned advocate by the :2:
concerned officer. The learned counsel for the corporation on instructions contained in the said note makes a statement that if the petitioner files fresh application for licence under section 394 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 for storing LPG cylinders, then the same will be considered on merits and appropriate decision will be taken within a period of three months from today. In view of the aforesaid statement it is clarified that the impugned order dated 18.12.2004 does not survive.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking in this court dated 29.12.2004
inter-alia stating that till the application under section 394 is decided by the corporation they will not store the LPG cylinders in the said premises or in the truck in the surrounding areas. The said undertaking is accepted. In the light of statement made by the Corporation the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. The petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
sd/-
:3:
:3:
:3:
*********