Bombay High Court
S/1066/1992 of R K KALNAWAT Vs SIDHARTH N BHOJANI on 17 October 1994
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1066 OF 1979
Kaushal Sampat.... PlaintiffVs.
Vishwanath Kochar & Ors..... Defendents
Mr. Mukul Tally i/b S. Mohammedbhai & Co. forPlaintiff.
Mr. Dhawal Kedia i/b Law Charter, Mr. Ashwin Shetei/b Khaitan & Jaykar for defendant Nos. 1-A to 1-E.
P.C.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1) The defendants if so desire may file aformal application indicating the reasons for whichthey are opposing the admissibility of theparticular documents. That application will beconsidered on its own merits. If the defendantsfail to file the said application within two weeksfrom today, it is ordered that the CourtCommissioner shall proceed to record furtherevidence ignoring the objections raised by thedefendants in relation to the documents alreadypressed into service on behalf of the Plaintiff.
2) However, if the defendants take out the
formal application, further directions will beissued to the Court Commissioner as may be advised.
3) If no such directions are issued, the CourtCommissioner shall proceed with further recordingof the evidence so as to conclude the plaintiff’sevidence by 2nd November 2007 and submit a report.
4) Place this matter on 19th November 2007.
( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)