Bombay High Court
WPCR/38/2002 of CAETANO FERNANDES, PRISONER, AGUADA-GOA. Vs STATE OF GOA AND ANR., on 21 November 2002
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA ***** CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 38 OF 2002 Caetano Fernandes, prisoner serving sentence in Central Jail, Aguada, Goa. ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Goa, through Chief Secretary, Panaji, Goa, 2. Inspector General of Prisons, Collectorate North Goa, Panaji, and 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
*****
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 38 OF 2002
Caetano Fernandes,
prisoner serving
sentence in Central
Jail, Aguada, Goa.
Versus
1. State of Goa, through
Chief Secretary,
Panaji, Goa,
2. Inspector General of
Prisons, Collectorate
North Goa, Panaji, and
3. Superintendent of
Police, North Goa, Panaji.
... Respondents.
Smt. Asha Desai, advocate for the petitioner.
Shri A. P. Lawande, Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM: P. V. KAKADE, J.DATE: 21st November 2002.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for both the sides.
On insistence of the prisoner/ petitioner he was submitted to medical examination by a doctor practising Ayurvedic medicine and the report of the said Doctor of the choice of the petitioner is on record, wherein he has expressed that he would be in a position to give treatment to the prisoner/petitioner to his satisfaction and reasonably feels that the ailment which is suffered by the petitioner can be contained by Ayurvedic treatment. The learned counsel for the petitioner today further submitted that the prisoner/petitioner has never undergone allopathic treatment and insists that he should be give an opportunity to avail of the Ayurvedic treatment of Dr. A. K. Biswas of Mapusa, Goa, whose report is received after examination of the patient.
2. In my considered view, taking into account the report of Dr. Biswas and the insistence of of the petitioner, there should not be any difficulty in issuing directions to the jail authorities to submit the petitioner/patient to the treatment of Dr.A.K. Biswas on the basis of his report dated 26th October, 2002.
However, it would be made clear that the cost as well as the consequences of the treatment received at the hands of the said Ayurvedic medical practitioner, shall be entirely borne by the petitioner/patient and the State Government shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever if the said treatment fails.
3. Hence, the respondents are directed to make available the medical treatment of Dr. A. K. Biswas of Mapusa, Goa, to the petitioner/patient at the petitioner’s cost and responsibility for the consequences which would follow, immediately and, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of this Order. With these directions the petition stands disposed of. It is clarified that if the petitioner is required to be taken to the Hospital of the concerned medical practitioner everyday, the transport charges also would be borne by the petitioner. However, if he has to be admitted in the concerned hospital for the purposes of medical treatment, then transport charges will be according to the rules of the jail.
P. V. KAKADE, J.
mc.