BA/1089/2016 of TULSIRAM S/O. GANPATRAO BARAPATRE (IN JAIL) Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. P.S.O., P.S. LAKADGANJ DIST. NAGPUR on 30 December 2016

ba.1089.161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Criminal Application [BA] No.1089 of 2016

(Tulsiram s/o Ganpatrao Barapatre

vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Lakadganj, District Nagpur)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Shri R.M. Daga, Advocate for the Applicant.Shri V.P. Maldhure, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

Heard.

Perused the F.I.R. and the reply of the prosecutionas well as the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge,Nagpur.

Now it is clear that no more police custody remand of the accused could be granted. The only evidence as seenfrom the reply of the prosecution is in the nature ofconfessional statements of none other than the accusedthemselves. In these circumstances, no purpose is going to beserved by keeping the applicant in jail for any longer period oftime. Hence, the order.

The application is allowed. It is directed that theapplicant be released on bail on his furnishing a P.R. Bond inthe sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one solvent surety in thelike sum on the conditions that (i) he shall attend the ba.1089.162

concerned police station on every Sunday between 11:00 a.m.and 12:00 p.m. till charge-sheet is filed and shall make himselfavailable for further investigation, if any, at the call of theInvestigating Officer; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecutionwitnesses in any manner and (iii) shall co-operate with thetrial Court in expeditious disposal of the case.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE

*sdw