Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/1841/2007 of DEVENDRA JOSHI Vs STATE AND OTHERS on 29 December 2007
2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for the
WPSS 1841 of 2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.
Heard Sri Sudhir Singh, learned counsel
for the petitioner, Sri N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel respondent no. 3.
learned
for
By means of this writ petition petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to rectify the grant of pay increment in accordance with G.O. dated 20.2.97 in the light of option exercised by the petitioner 58 years as age of superannuation.
2. Issue any other order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Award cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.
During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that raising all his grievances, the petitioner has already moved a representation 05.10.2007, Annexure 5 to the writ petition before respondent no. 2, Director, Development Directorate, Dehradun confined his prayer that respondent no. 2 may be directed to take decision on representation of the petitioner within particular period prescribed by this Court. The prayer is innocuous.
counsel for the petitioner has submitted that raising all his grievances, the petitioner has dated 05.10.2007, Annexure 5 to the writ petition Urban
and
confined his prayer that respondent no. 2 may the a Accordingly, I direct the Director, Urban Development Directorate, Dehradun, respondent no. 2 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 05.10.2007 within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
With this direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. All the pending applications stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
(M.M.G., J.)