Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1265/2011 of SMT. LAXMI DEVI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 30 December 2011
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 30th day of December, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1265 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Smt. Laxmi Devi, aged major, W/o Sri Mahesh Suteri, R/o Village Thanta, Patti Kshetra Mangoli, Tehsil Lohaghat,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital: the 30[th] day of December, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1265 of 2011
Order on the Bail Application:
CRIMINAL SIDE
Smt. Laxmi Devi, aged major, W/o Sri Mahesh Suteri, R/o Village Thanta, Patti Kshetra Mangoli, Tehsil Lohaghat, District Champawat.
………Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
…… Opposite Party
Arising out of Case Crime No. 01 of 2011, Under Section- 363, 366A, 120B, 109, 506 I.P.C., Patti Kshetra Mangoli, District-Champawat.
Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.
Mr. Devesh Upreti, Advocate, present for the applicant.
Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State.
Heard.
Applicant Laxmi Devi, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 01 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 363, 366A, 120B, 109, 506 I.P.C., Patti. Kshetra Mangoli, District Champawat, has sought her release on bail.
Applicant is a woman. It is pleaded that from the First Information Report itself it is clear that the applicant is named on suspicion, as the two main accused (Om Kumar and Sewa Ram), allegedly after giving reference of the applicant stayed in the house of the complainant and on the next day morning slippedwith her daughter.
In the above circumstances, particularly considering the fact that applicant is a woman, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail.
The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Laxmi Devi, be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champawat.
30.12.2011 JM
(Prafulla C. Pant, J.)