Bombay High Court

CRMA/250/2011 of SHRI. SURENDRA SAVIO GADDI, PRESENTLY IN SADA JAIL, VASCO-GOA Vs STATE THROUGH P.P., on 29 December 2011

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2011 SHRI. SURENDRA SAVIO GADDI, PRESENTLY IN SADA JAIL, VASCO-GOA ... Applicant Versus STATE THROUGH P.P., ... Respondent Mr.Anthony Joe D'silva Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. C.A. Fereira, Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOACRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2011

SHRI. SURENDRA SAVIO GADDI, PRESENTLY IN SADA JAIL, VASCO-GOA VersusSTATE THROUGH P.P.,

... Applicant

... Respondent

Mr.Anthony Joe D'silva Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. C.A. Fereira, Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

P.C.:

-Coram:F. M. REIS, J.-Date:29th December, 2011

Heard Mr. Anthony Joe D'silva learned Advocate for theApplicant.

This is an application for suspension of sentence as well as torelease the Applicant on bail as he has been arrested in view of thedismissal of the appeal preferred by the applicant challenging theJudgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bicholim,whereby the applicant has been convicted for the offences punishableunder sections 279,337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, wherebyhe has been sentenced for imprisonment of two months and fine of2500/-.

Mr. Anthony Joe D'silva learned advocate for the Applicant hasargued that he has a good case on merit and that the applicant was onbail during the trial of the Criminal Case before the J.M.F.C. as wellas during the Appeal before the learned Session Judge.

Learned counsel for the respondent states that the applicant hasbeen arrested in view of the dismissal of the appeal by the learnedAdditional Session Judge. The learned Public Prosecutor states that considering that the applicant was on bail during the trial, he issubmitting to the order of this Hon'ble Court.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and takingnote of the facts that the applicant was on bail during the trial andwhen the Appeal proceedings were going before the learned SessionJudge. I find that, the applicant is entitled for bail pending finaldisposal of the Revision petition before this Court. In view of theabove I pass following Order.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1) The Applicant is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing the personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) and one Surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jailor.

2) The applicant to remain present in this Court for the hearing ofthe above petition.

Application disposed of.

Authenticated copy of this order be furnished to the parties as perrules.

mv

F. M. REIS, J.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead